Tuesday, March 2, 2010

Employee Communications: trends, fads, and what's next

Communication plays a critical role in engaging employees. Social media, eco-friendly, Web 2.0, traditional- which strategies and tactics connect most effectively with today's workforce?

Employee communications link the goals of the HR and benefits departments with employee awareness, commitment and engagement.

Messages from HR tend to concentrate on issues that have the most impact on the value of the employment experience: compensation, benefits, career development, training and work-life balance.

That means the effectiveness of these communications has a lot to do with how employees view their jobs. According to the 2009 Aon Consulting Benefits and Talent survey, one-third of employers believe communications have a significant impact on employee appreciation of the employment "deal."

With unemployment expected to ease, retaining and engaging employees will again be a critical issue for C-suite leaders. Yet, over the last several years, job satisfaction has been on the decline, with only 45% of Americans being satisfied with their jobs, as reported in the 2009 edition of The Conference Board annual job satisfaction survey.

In a recent study by CareerBuilder, 24% of workers report that they no longer feel loyal to their current company and 19% intend to leave this year. So, what can an organization do?

Clearly, employee communications play a critical role in engaging employees. But even the savviest organizational leaders can be challenged when it comes to effectively reaching their employees. How do you connect with employees when they represent different generations, cultures and communications styles? Should you integrate social media into your communications strategy? How do you get the most value for your communications dollar? What is the best way to deliver eco-friendly communications?

As employers consider how to modernize their employee communications strategies to succeed in today's business environment - and look to you for help - they may have to answer some or all of these questions. The responses will depend on each organization's culture and employee population. It's a challenging balance that requires finding the right mix of the new and the "tried and true."

Green communications

Organizations are embracing technology to reduce costs, be more environmentally friendly and increase efficiency. However, there is a right way to be "green" and a wrong way. Forcing print communications into a paperless format that is distributed electronically without considering how the materials will be used can be a path to failure.

Print communications are linear - typically read in order from the first page to the last page. Electronic and Web communications are more dimensional, with the reader, not the writer, selecting how to access the information.

As a result, electronic content should be organized and formatted differently, with information "chunked" into smaller components that are able to stand alone. Navigation is a key element, and graphics, color palettes and design elements play a different role.

In an effort to be eco-friendly and to save money, many organizations post electronic versions of print materials (such as PDFs) on their company Intranet site. There are several reasons why this is not "green," effective, or less costly:

* Cost-shifting, not cost-saving: It's hard to read print materials on a computer screen. So, the reader usually prints the electronic document to a local office printer. The document is no longer paperless and the cost is shifted from a commercial printer to the office supply vendor.

* Less return on your creative investment: The investment made in the design, look and feel of your important document may be lost when the materials are printed on a one-color office printer which has a much lower quality than the professional press for which it was intended. And, even if the reader doesn't print the document, the content is generally less effective because it was not written to be read and absorbed from a screen.

If your objective is to produce more eco-friendly communications and your documents are designed as print materials, work with your printer to use soy inks and recycled paper or paper that has been certified by the Forest Stewardship Council and the Sustainable Forestry Initiative.

If your intent is to make information available via the Web or an Intranet site, for optimal results make the investment from the beginning to develop communications that are designed to be consumed electronically.

The next level

Being more environmentally friendly is only one reason for using technology in your communications. LinkedIn, Facebook, Twitter, blogs, wikis and other social media have dramatically changed the way we interact with each other. Often referred to as Web 2.0, new media allows people to form communities based on common interests and shared ideas.

Originally popular with young people as a high-tech way to connect with each other, social media is now mainstream. For example, many corporations have Facebook pages and Twitter accounts. So, it makes sense for the HR community to embrace Web 2.0 as another way to communicate with employees.

For example, consider:

■ Creating blogs and wikis as part of the launch of a new program, initiative, or benefit plan to invite feedback and ideas.
■ Using text messages, instant messaging and tweets (Twitter updates) to send brief announcements and reminders (e.g., enrollment deadlines).
■ Building an internal social network site, a la Facebook, that allows employees to share information, ideas, photos, videos and documents, and stay connected.
■ Developing a YouTube-like repository for company videos and recorded presentations.
There are many ways in which new media can be used to engage employees from recruitment through retirement. With some creativity and a little IT help, social media can help employers rethink their HR communications beyond the traditional forms.

Don't abandon the traditional

Everyone is aware of the diversity of today's workforce. For the first time in American history, four different eras are represented in the workforce. Generally defined by age or generation, these groups can be loosely defined as:

■ Generation Y or millenials - born after 1982
■Generation X - born between 1960 and 1982
■Baby Boomers - born between 1943 and 1960
■Traditionalists - born before 1943
Each of these generations has been shaped by the experiences of their time, which affects their approach and preferences for work and communications. For example, consider how the telephone has evolved for each generation:

■Generation Y - everyone has a cell phone and can be reached anytime, anywhere.
■Generation X - home phones became cordless and cell phones were introduced but, early on, were too big to fit into a pocket.
■Baby Boomers - push-button phones were the new innovation.
■Traditionalists - party line phones were not unusual and phone numbers often started with letters, not numbers.
Layered on top of generational differences, employee demographics are diverse and multicultural. So, while there is a strong temptation to embrace technology, new media and eco-friendly methods of communications distribution, it's important to consider the effectiveness traditional communications methods may have for the organization, such as mailing to the home and face-to-face meetings.

If a large percentage of your workforce does not have access to a computer at work, you risk alienating these employees with a heavy reliance on electronic communications. In addition, there is research that shows that both print and Web "cues" are needed to make electronic communications perform as well as traditional print.

Learning information on the Web can be difficult because of the distractions of its interactive nature, such as following hyperlinks, navigating the site, scrolling down, etc. Therefore, if the information you need to share requires concentrated attention and careful decision-making, you may need to offer a variety of media, including print and in-person meetings.

Plus, the low-tech method of mailing communications to the home enables you to reach a very important audience - employees' families.

A matter of balance

As you navigate the new frontiers available in employee communications, you may feel you are in a world where you don't speak the language, completely fluent and well-acclimated, or somewhere in between. But, no matter how you integrate new approaches and techniques into your employee communications strategy, keep in mind these guiding principles:

■ Know your audience and its communications preferences.
■ Make your messages clear and communicate them in ways employees will understand.
■ Know how you need the information to be used by your workforce.
This will help ensure you have the right balance of communications methods that engage employees and achieve your communications objectives. EBA



--------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Box-Farnen is a vice president and communications consultant in Aon's Human Capital Consulting practice in Baltimore, and a member of EBA's editorial advisory board. She can be reached at helen_box-farnen@aon.com.

2 comments:

  1. Interesting blog, Box-Farnen, but it’s missing an important part of the equation: Generation Jones (between the Boomers and Generation X). Google Generation Jones, and you’ll see it’s gotten lots of media attention, and many top commentators from many top publications and networks (Washington Post, Time magazine, NBC, Newsweek, ABC, etc.) now specifically use this term. In fact, the Associated Press' annual Trend Report chose the Rise of Generation Jones as the #1 trend of 2009. I found this page helpful because it gives a pretty good overview of recent media interest in GenJones: http://generationjones.com/2009latest.html

    It is important to distinguish between the post-WWII demographic boom in births vs. the cultural generations born during that era. Generations are a function of the common formative experiences of its members, not the fertility rates of its parents. And most analysts now see generations as getting shorter (usually 10-15 years now), partly because of the acceleration of culture. Many experts now believe it breaks down more or less this way:

    DEMOGRAPHIC boom in babies: 1946-1964
    Baby Boom GENERATION: 1942-1953
    Generation Jones: 1954-1965
    Generation X: 1966-1978
    Generation Y/Millennials: 1979-1993

    ReplyDelete
  2. An OK overview--but two things that are missing are a link between an organization's agenda and the range of tools you suggest, and a recognition that benefits and "engagement" are but part of the overall organizational agenda--even if they form a larger part of the HR agenda.

    Indeed, your piece highlights the concern about having HR "own" the employee communication infrastructure--what may make total sense from an HR perspective might also conflict, or preclude easy alignment, with external messaging and other organizational priorities.

    All the best,

    Mike Klein--The Intersection, Brussels
    http://intersectionblog.wordpress.com

    ReplyDelete